I recently stumbled across this blog post from The Atlantic, posted in April of last year, in which a young woman explains her position opposing gay marriage. I always appreciate reading opposing points of view that are written thoughtfully, and I have to commend this young woman for sharing her perspective. And now I’d like to explain why she’s wrong.
Everyone in the whole world has sinned
The center of her argument is that she believes that homosexuality is a sin as defined in the Bible; but where others stop there, she does go further and acknowledge that even believing that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t mean that she believes that gay people are evil or bad. Everyone is a sinner.
My belief is that sin is anything that goes against God’s design and His rules. People who don’t believe in sin obviously do not see anything wrong with homosexual behavior and they don’t know why people like me speak out against it, so their reasoning is that what I say must come from hatred.
But if I hated all sinners, I’d hate myself.
There are lots of sins that exist, and in fact, everyone in the whole world has sinned.
I have no interest in making an argument whether or not the Christian Bible does define homosexuality as a sin, although there are certainly a large number of Christians who would happily engage in
that debate. My obvious issue is that the Christian Bible does not define my legal rights.
Do you really want to start legislating sin?
If you really want to start legislating sin, let’s start with the Ten Commandments. Let’s make it illegal to work on Sunday, to curse (or if you want to be more literal, specifically taking the Lord’s name in vain), or to commit adultery. Should you have to pay a fine if you are jealous of your neighbor’s boat? When you are mean to your mother, you spend a couple of nights in lock-up.
That all seems ridiculous, of course. Even for Christians, sin is a part of life. Some sins are also crimes, but there are a lot of sins that we know we’re going to end up committing from time to time – and we don’t expect to be arrested, fined or censored for them.
We legislate to protect citizens against acts that damage our society and hurt other people. Gay marriage hurts no one.
Is it really just semantics?
The young woman in that original blog post did say that she wasn’t sure if maybe government shouldn’t just get out of marriage entirely. I could argue that no one should be legally “married”, but all couples have a right to a legal commitment that is equal for hetero and homosexual couples. However, a lot of members of the gay community feel strongly about that word “marriage”.
If it comes down to definitions, can we agree that we define words differently in a biblical sense than in a secular sense? When you watch American Idol, are you really worshipping a false God?
In the end, if all individuals who are against gay marriage were as well meaning and well reasoned as this young woman, we could have a reasoned discussion and almost certainly end up on common, equal footing.